Introduction
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146
The growing interest in the cognitive foundations of behavior within the information
systems (IS) field has led to a focus on representing and analyzing the cognitions of
individuals and groups. Cognitive representations are created by eliciting the relevant
cognitions of the participants and casting their cognitions into appropriate structural
representations. Over the years there have been numerous methods of representing
cognition that have been used, such as: argument mapping (Fletcher & Huff, 1990),
context analysis (e.g., Birnhaum-More & Weiss, 1990), repertory grid (e.g., Tan & Hunter,
2002), and the Self-Q technique (e.g., Bougon, Weick & Binkhorst, 1977) to name a few.
Causal mapping is an additional technique that can be used to represent cognition.
Causal mapping captures the structure of the causal assertions of an individual or group.
Many believe that causal mapping holds great promise in addressing phenomena from
a cognitive perspective, which is an under-utilized lens in the IS field. As we move causal
mapping into the IS field, it is important that we understand the method, its strengths and
limitations and place it within the spectrum of research methods. Many researchers have
made assumptions (both explicit and implicit) regarding causal mapping, without explicating
the steps involved. Thus buried in many of the studies found in the literature are
the steps used to develop the cognitive representations of participants.
This chapter seeks to explicate the causal mapping (CM) process so that researchers and
practitioners can utilize this method to address IS issues within organizations using a
cognitive lens. The objectives of the chapter are two-fold:
• To demonstrate in detail how CM can be used to understand IS issues from a
cognitive perspective
• To provoke interest in expanding the boundaries of the CM method within the IS
field as we present advances and issues related to CM
In the remainder of the chapter, I provide the motivation behind causal mapping research
and detail the causal mapping approach for both capturing individual maps and deriving
collective causal maps. Next, I detail the representation and analysis of the maps, and
discuss some key issues to address when reporting the results. I conclude the chapter
with a summary of the key decision points researchers will face when conducting causal
mapping research.