Quadrant 1: Jane Cites Personal Productivity
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186
187 188 189 190 191 192
During an interview with a researcher, Jane stated that, as a result of
her coaching, she was much better able to set priorities and not feel
like the victim of an oppressive workload. Her ability to schedule
work improved, and she was able to get more done in a shorter
period. Jane said that she gained four to six hours per week. Monetary
benefits were determined as follows:
1. The first step was to determine the total annualized monetary
benefit:
_ Four hours was the lower end of the range that Jane gave,
so to be conservative, the lower end of the range is used.
_ $65 per hour was the standard value supplied by HR.
_ 48 weeks was used rather than 52 to account for time away
from work.
4 hours Ґ $65 per hour Ґ 48 weeks = $12,480
2. The next step is to isolate the effects of coaching:
_ Jane attributed 80 percent of this improvement to her
coaching and was 70 percent confident in this estimate.
$12,480 Ґ 80% Ґ 70% = $6,989
_ $6,989 was added to the benefits pool.