К оглавлению
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 

Cluster Analysis: a statistical technique for highlighting the pattern of

relationships in a repertory grid by grouping elements (and then constructs)

on the basis of the similarity of individual ratings. Produces outputs which

are, arguably, more client-friendly than those provided by a principal

components analysis, q.v. p. 118.

Construct: one of the four components of a repertory grid; an attribute which

an individual uses to make sense of his or her experience. Expressed as two

contrasted poles; constitutes a choice about that experience or a preference

with respect to that experience, p. 10.

Content Analysis: the only feasible way of aggregating the information

present in a large set of repertory grids, by collecting and categorising the

different meanings of constructs present in the set. Honey’s technique

makes use of some of the information available in the ratings as well,

pp. 146, 169.

Constructivism: the epistemological position which asserts that the significance

and usefulness (not ‘truth’) of a proposition is established by an

agreement between individuals about the meaning of the observations they

make. The main concern is therefore for the extent of shared assumptions

and the reliability of observations made in order to understand what is

going on, p. 44. Contrast with Positivism, q.v.

Core Construct: a construct which is central to the individual, around which

s/he builds his or her personal identity and its place in the wider scheme of

existence. All core constructs have a relationship to an individual’s values,

though not all personal values are core constructs, p. 83.

Corollary: a proposition which supplements a fundamental statement. In

Kelly’s personal construct theory (see Appendix 6) there are 11 of them, all

amplifying his fundamental postulate about human psychological

functioning, p. 59.

C-P-C Cycle: one of three models for describing change in construing, and

particularly those which relate to decision making. People change their

minds by engaging in Circumspection, Pre-emption, and Control, in that

order, pp. 219–220.

Creativity Cycle: another of the three models for describing change in

construing; views the creative process as one in which implicational

connections between constructs are successively loosened and tightened,

p. 219.

Dendrogram: a diagram, which looks like a tree, whose branches represent the

relationships between adjacent elements (or adjacent constructs) as

produced in a cluster analysis, pp. 121, 122.

Elaborative Choice: a decision among alternative ways of construing a

situation which results in permanent changes in a person’s construct

system, p. 231.

Element: one of the four components of a repertory grid; an example of,

sampling of, instance of, or occurrence within, a given Topic, p. 13.

Emergent Pole: that part of a construct to which the individual explicitly

refers; for example, the meaning of ‘tense’ when the individual is using the

construct ‘tense versus relaxed’ and talks about being tense. In triadic grid

elicitation it is normally identified as the characteristic which two of the

triad of elements have in common, and is written down on the left of the

grid-sheet, p. 48. Contrast with Implicit Pole, q.v.

Experience Cycle: one of three models for describing change in construing;

consists of stages of Anticipation, Investment, Encounter, Assessment and

Constructive Revisions. Managers and business students will recognise the

similarity to Kolb’s Cycle, p. 219.

Implicit Pole: that part of a construct which is left tacit by the individual; for

example, the meaning of ‘relaxed’ when the individual is using the

construct ‘tense versus relaxed’ and talks about being tense. In triadic

elicitation it is normally identified as the contrast – the characteristic

pertaining to the odd one out of the elements, and is written down on the

right of the grid sheet, p. 48. Contrast with Emergent Pole, q.v.

Negotiation of Meaning: the process underlying construct elicitation by

which you arrive at a precise understanding of the individual’s personal

meaning, p. 11.


Ontological Choices: decisions made by individuals, in line with their

personal values, through which their priorities in life and existence are

expressed. What’s your bottom line? Are justice and the rule of law

important, or should human frailty be allowed for? Are business

organisations run for their employees, their shareholders or their

customers? Is education fundamentally about preparing people to make a

contribution to society, or is it basically about personal growth and

development? Each of these alternatives represents an ontological choice,

p. 191.

Personal Repertoire: the totality of constructs which a particular individual

uses, p. 12.

Positivism: the epistemological position which asserts that the truth of a

proposition can be established by facts which exist independently of the

observer, waiting to be discovered and to be put into use. The main concern

is therefore for the validity and reliability of observations made in order to

explain what is going on, p. 44. Contrast with Constructivism, q.v.

Principal Components Analysis: a statistical technique for highlighting the

pattern or relationships in a repertory grid, by identifying hypothetical

underlying components on the basis of patterns of variability in the ratings.

Outputs are, arguably, less client-friendly than those produced by a cluster

analysis, q.v., but more useful in identifying ‘what needs to change’ in a

counselling or guidance application, pp. 127–130.

Range of Convenience: the set of various realms of discourse within which a

particular construct can be usefully applied. Constructs like ‘Comfortable–

Painful’ have a wide range of convenience (you can use them in a wide

variety of contexts), while those like ‘Incandescent–Luminescent’ have a

very narrow range of convenience (you can’t use them to talk about much,

other than light sources), p. 12.

Ratings: one of the four components of a repertory grid; a number on a scale

applied to each element on each construct, by which an individual

expresses a meaning, pp. 13–14.

Realm of Discourse: the general field of personal knowledge within which the

Topic of a grid is situated, p. 12.

Resistance-to-Change Technique: a way of helping a person to decide on

their value priorities: those which represent ontological bedrock, and those

over which s/he’s prepared to compromise a little bit, p. 197.

Social Desirability Effect: the tendency for people to express their attitudes,

opinions, beliefs, and values in a socially acceptable manner. When working

with personal values, Resistance-to-Change Technique, q.v., can control the

effect to some extent, p. 197.

Topic: one of the four components of a repertory grid; the subject-matter of a

particular repertory grid, pp. 12–13.



Adams-Webber, J. (1989) ‘Some reflections on the ‘‘meaning’’ of repertory grid

responses’. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology 2, 77–92.

Bales, K.F. (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups.

Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1976) The Social Nature of Reality. Harmondsworth:


Boose, J.H. (1985) ‘A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on

personal construct psychology’. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 23, 495–


Brown, L.D. & Kaplan, R.E. (1981) ‘Participative research in a factory’ in P. Reason & J.

Rowan (eds), Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research (pp. 303–314).

Chichester: Wiley.

Burleson, B.R., Kunkel, A.W. & Szolwinski, J.B. (1997) ‘Similarity in cognitive

complexity and attraction to friends and lovers: experimental and correlational

studies’. Journal of Contructivist Psychology 10, 221–248.

Burr, V. & Butt, T. (1992) An Invitation to Personal Construct Psychology. London: Whurr.

Caputi, P. & Reddi, P. (1999) ‘A comparison of triadic and dyadic methods of personal

construct elicitation’. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 12, 253–263.

Cohen, J. (1968) ‘Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled

disagreement or partial credit’. Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220.

Collett, P. (1979) ‘The repertory grid in psychological research’ in G.P. Ginsburg (ed.),

Emerging Strategies in Social Psychological Research. Chichester: Wiley.

Cook, M. (1998) Personnel Selection. London: Wiley.

Cromwell, R. & Caldwell, D.F. (1962) ‘A comparison of ratings based on personal

constructs of self and others’. Journal of Clinical Psychology 18, 43–46.

Cronbach, L.J. (1964) Essentials of Psychological Testing, London: Harper & Row.

Davis, H., Stroud, A. & Green, L. (1989) ‘Child characterization sketch’. International

Journal of Personal Construct Psychology 2, 323–337.

Duck, S. (1973) Personal Relationships and Personal Constructs: A Study of Friendship

Formation. London: Wiley.

Eden, C., Jones, S. & Sims, D. (1983) Messing About in Problems. Oxford: Pergamon


Edmonds, T. (1979) ‘Applying personal construct theory in occupational guidance’.

British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 7, 225–233.

Epting, F.R., Probert, J.S. & Pittman, S.D. (1993) ‘Alternative strategies for construct

elicitation: experimenting with experience’. International Journal of Personal Construct

Psychology 6, 79–98.

Feixas, G., Geldschla˜ger, H. & Neimeyer, R.A. (2002) ‘Content analysis of personal

constructs’. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 15, 1–19.

Flanagan, J.C. (1954) ‘The critical incident technique’. Psychological Bulletin 51, 237–258.

Fonda, N. (1982) ‘Using repertory grids in counselling’ in V. Stewart & A. Stewart (eds),

Business Applications of Repertory Grid (pp. 116–141). London: McGraw-Hill.

Fransella, F., Bell, R. & Bannister, D. (2004) A Manual of Repertory Grid Technique. 2nd

edn. London: Routledge.

Gaines, B. & Shaw, M. (1993) ‘Knowledge acquisition tools based on personal construct

psychology’. Knowledge Engineering Review 8, 49–85.

Greenaway, R. (2002) ‘Experiential learning cycles’. www

learning.cycles.htm, accessed 30 December 2002.

Harreґ, R. (1981) ‘The positivist-empiricist approach and its alternative’ in P. Reason & J.

Rowan (eds), Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research (pp. 3–17).

Chichester: Wiley.

Harter, S.L., Erbes, C.R. & Hart, C.C. (2001) ‘Use of the role construct repertory grid to

assess the personal constructions of sexual abuse survivors’. Paper given at the Ninth

Biennial Conference, North American Personal Construct Network, State University

of New York at New Paltz.

Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J.W. Jr. & Woodman, R.W. (1995) Organizational Behavior.

Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing.

Hill, R.A. (1995) ‘Content analysis for creating and depicting aggregated personal

construct derived cognitive maps’ in R.A. Neimeyer & G.J. Neimeyer (eds), Advances

in Personal Construct Psychology (pp. 101–132). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.

Hinkle, D.N. (1965) ‘The Change in Personal Constructs from the Viewpoint of a

Theory of Implications’, PhD thesis, Ohio University.

Hisrich, R.D. & Jankowicz, A.D. (1990) ‘Intuition in venture capital decisions: an

exploratory study using a new technique’. Journal of Business Venturing 5, 49–62.

Holsti, O.R. (1968) ‘Content analysis’ in G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (eds), The Handbook of

Social Psychology, vol. 2. Research Methods. London: Addison-Wesley.

Honey, P. (1979) ‘The repertory grid in action’. Industrial and Commercial Training 11,


Horley, J. (1991) ‘Values and beliefs as personal constructs’. International Journal of

Personal Construct Psychology 4, 1–14.

Horley, J. (2000) ‘Value assessment and everyday activities’. Journal of Constructivist

Psychology 13, 67–73.

Humphreys, P. & McFadden, W. (1980) ‘Experiences with MAUD: Aiding decision

structuring versus bootstrapping the decision maker’. Acta Psychologica 45, 51–69.

Hunt, D.E. (1987) Beginning with Ourselves: In Practice, Theory, and Human Affairs.

Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Jankowicz, A.D. (1987a) ‘Whatever became of George Kelly? Applications and

implications’. American Psychologist 42, 481–487.

Jankowicz, A.D. (1987b) ‘Intuition in small business lending decisions’. Journal of Small

Business Management 25, 45–52.

Jankowicz, A.D. (1990) ‘Applications of personal construct psychology in business

practice’ in G.J. Neimeyer & R.A. Neimeyer (eds), Advances in Personal Construct

Psychology, vol. 1 (pp. 257–287). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.


Jankowicz, A.D. (1996a) ‘On ‘‘resistance to change’’: in the post-command economies,

and elsewhere’ in M. Lee, H. Letiche, R. Crawshaw & M. Thomas (eds), Management

Education in the New Europe: Boundaries and Complexity (pp. 139–162). London:

International Thomson Business Press.

Jankowicz, A.D. (1996b) ‘Personal values among public sector employees: a

methodological study’. Paper given at the 3rd Conference of the European

Personal Construct Association, Reading, UK, April.

Jankowicz, A.D. (2000a) Business Research Projects. 3rd edn. London: Thomson.

Jankowicz, A.D. (2000b) ‘Self-reference in the identification of personal values: is there a

functional limit constraining a hierarchy of constructs?’ in J.M. Fisher & N. Cornelius

(eds), Challenging the Boundaries: PCP Perspectives for the New Millennium, Proceedings

of the 5th Conference of the European Personal Construct Association (pp. 109–119).

Malta, April.

Jankowicz, A.D. (2001) ‘Why does subjectivity make us nervous? Making the tacit

explicit’. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2, 61–73.

Jankowicz, A.D. & Cooper, K. (1982) ‘The use of focused repertory grids in counselling’.

British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 10, 136–150.

Jankowicz, A.D. & Thomas, L.F. (1982/1983) ‘The FOCUS cluster-analysis algorithm in

human resource development’. Personnel Review 11, 15–22; erratum: 1983, 12, 22.

Jones, H. (1998) ‘Bringing two worlds together: personal and management development

in the NHS’. Human Resource Development International 1, 341–356.

Kaczmarek, P. & Jankowicz, A.D. (1991) ‘American students’ perceptions of counselor

approachability: professional implications’. International Journal for the Advancement

of Counseling 14, 313–324.

Kelly, G.A. (1955/1991) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. 2nd edn. London:


Kelly, G.A. (1963) A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs, London:


Kelly, G.A. (1970) ‘A brief introduction to personal construct theory’ in D. Bannister

(ed.), Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory (pp. 1–30). London: Academic Press.

Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Landfield, A.W. (1968) ‘The extremity rating revisited within the context of personal

construct theory’. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 7, 135–139.

Landfield, A.W. (1971) Personal Construct Systems in Psychotherapy. Chicago: Rand


Landfield, A.W. & Cannell, J.E. (1988) ‘Ways of assessing functionally independent

construction, meaningfulness, and construction in hierarchy’ in J.C.S. Mancuso &

M.L.G. Shaw (eds), Cognition and Personal Structure: Computer Access and Analysis

(pp. 67–89). New York: Praeger.

Leitner, L.M. & Pfenninger, D.T. (1994) ‘Sociality and optimal functioning’. Journal of

Constructivist Psychology 7, 119–135.

MacMillan, I., Zemann, C.L. & SubbaNarashimha, P.M. (1987) ‘Criteria distinguishing

successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process’. Journal of

Business Venturing 2, 123–137.

Mair, M. (1989) ‘Kelly, Bannister, and a story-telling psychology’. International Journal of

Personal Construct Psychology 2, 1–14.

Mair, M. (1990) ‘Telling psychological tales’. International Journal of Personal Construct

Psychology 3, 121–135.

Neimeyer, G.J. & Neimeyer, R.A. (1985) ‘Relational trajectories: a personal construct

contribution’. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2, 325–349.

Neimeyer, R.A. (1981) ‘The structure and meaningfulness of tacit construing’ in H.

Bonarius, R. Holland & S. Rosenberg (eds), Personal Construct Psychology: Recent

Advances in Theory and Practice (pp. 105–119). London: Macmillan.

Neimeyer, R.A. (1983) ‘The development of personal construct psychology’ in J.R.

Adams-Webber & J. Mancuso (eds), Applications of Personal Construct Theory (pp. 155–

172). London: Academic Press.

Neimeyer, R.A. (1985) The Development of Personal Construct Psychology. Lincoln, NB:

University of Nebraska Press.

Neuendorf, K.A. (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook. London: Sage.

Nevill, D.D. & Super, D.E. (1989) The Values Scale: Application and Research, Palo Alto,

CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

O’Cinneide, B. (1986) The Case for Irish Enterprise. Dublin: Enterprise Publications.

Perrault, W.D.J. & Leigh, L.E. (1989) ‘Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative

judgements’. Journal of Marketing Research 26, 135–148.

Pervin, L. (1973) ‘On construing our constructs: a review of Bannister and Fransella’s

Inquiring Man’. Contemporary Psychology 18, 110–112.

Riemann, R. (1990) ‘The bipolarity of personal constructs’. International Journal of

Personal Construct Psychology 3, 149–165.

Russ-Eft, D., Burns, J.Z., Dean, P.J., Hatcher, T., Otte, F.L. & Preskill, H. (1999) Standards

on Ethics and Integrity. Report to Academy of Human Resource Development,


Salmon, P. (1976) ‘Grid measure with child subjects’ in P. Slater (ed.), Explorations of

Interpersonal Space. New York: Wiley.

Saussure, F. de (1915/1983) Course in General Linguistics. London: Duckworth.

Scheer, J. (2003) ‘Computer programmes for grids’.

html, accessed 8 January 2003.

Selltiz, C.S., Wrightsman, L.S. & Cook, S.W. (1981) Research Methods in Social Relations.

London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Sewell, K.W., Adams-Webber, J., Mitterer, J. & Cromwell, R.L. (1992) ‘Computerised

repertory grids: review of the literature’. International Journal of Personal Construct

Psychology 5, 1–23.

Shaw, M.L.G. (1988) On Becoming a Personal Scientist. London: Academic Press.

Stewart, V. & Stewart, A. (1982) Business Applications of Repertory Grid. London:


Thomas, L.F. (1977) User’s Guide to the FOCUS Programme. Uxbridge: Centre for the

Study of Human Learning, Brunel University.

Thomas, L.F. & Harri-Augstein, S. (1985) Self-Organised Learning. London: Routledge

and Kegan Paul.

Tyebjee, T.T. & Bruno, A.V. (1984) ‘A model of venture capital investment activity’.

Management Science 30, 1051–1066.

Viney, L.L. & Westbrook, M.T. (1976) ‘Cognitive anxiety: a method of content analysis

of verbal samples’. Journal of Personality Assessment 40, 140–150.


Watson, W., Ponthieu, L. & Doster, J. (1995) ‘Business owner-managers’ descriptions of

entrepreneurship: a content analysis’. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 8, 33–51.

Whitehead, J. (1994) ‘How do I improve the quality of my management? A

participatory action research approach’. Management Learning 25, 137–153.

Winter, D. (1992) Personal Construct Psychology in Clinical Practice. London: Routledge.

Yorke, D.M. (1978) ‘Repertory grids in educational research: some methodological

considerations’. British Educational Research Journal 4, 63–74.

Yorke, D.M. (1983) ‘Straight or bent: an inquiry into rating scales in repertory grids’.

British Educational Research Journal 9, 141–151.

Yorke, M. (1989) ‘The intolerable wrestle: words, numbers, and meanings’. International

Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 2, 65–76.