Introduction
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115
There is hardly a more contentious issue in American society than the
ownership of firearms and various proposals for their control. To make
reasonable decisions about these matters, public authorities must take
account of conflicting constitutional claims and divided public opinion as
well as the facts about the relationship between firearms and violence. In
performing these tasks, policy makers must try to strike a reasonable balance
between the costs and the benefits of private firearm ownership.
The costs seem obvious. In 2000, over 48,000 victims suffered nonfatal
gunshot wounds (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001) and
over 10,000 were murdered with a firearm (Federal Bureau of Investigation,
2001). Many more people, though not shot, are confronted by assailants
armed with a gun. Young people are especially affected by this, so
much so that firearm fatalities consistently rank among the leading causes
of death per capita for youth. In 2000, people ages 20 to 24 accounted for
almost one-fourth of all victims of homicides with a firearm (Federal Bureau
of Investigation, 2001). Moreover, there are more suicides than homicides
that are committed with firearms. And firearm-related accidents result
in many serious injuries.
These grim facts must be interpreted with caution. Firearms are involved
in homicides and suicides, but determining how many would have occurred
had no firearm been available is at best a difficult task. Between 1980 and
1984 there were more than three times as many nongun homicides per capita
in America than in England (Zimring and Hawkins, 1998). There were over
41,000 nongun homicides and over 63,000 gun homicides in the United
States during this period. New York City has had a homicide rate that is 8 to
15 times higher than London’s for at least the last 200 years, long before
either city could have had its rates affected by English gun control laws, the
advent of dangerous drugs, or the supposedly harmful effects of the mass
media (Monkkonen, 2001). Thus, the United States arguably has a high level
of violence and homicide independent of firearm availability. Nonetheless,
today homicides by a firearm occur in the United States at a rate that is more
than 63 times that of England, so firearms, though not the sole source of
violence, play a large role in it (Zimring and Hawkins, 1998).
The problem is the same with suicide. People often kill themselves with
firearms. There is some evidence that states with the highest rates of private
firearm ownership tend to be those with the highest proportion of suicides
committed with firearms (Azrael et al., 2004), and there are studies suggesting
that homes with firearms in them have more suicides than homes without firearms
(Hardy, 2002). However, it is difficult to determine how many people
would kill themselves by other means if no firearms were available.
Explaining a violent death is a difficult business. Personal temperament,
mental health, the availability of weapons, human motivation, law
enforcement policies, and accidental circumstances all play a role in leading
one person but not another to inflict serious violence. Furthermore, the
impact that a gun has on a situation depends critically on the nature of the
interaction taking place. A gun in the hand of a robber may have different
consequences than a gun in the hands of a potential robbery victim, a drug
dealer, or someone who is suicidal. The relationship between the individuals
may also be important in determining the impact of a gun. In a domestic
dispute, for instance, both parties might be well informed as to whether the
other person has a firearm. In a burglary or street robbery, the offender is
less likely to know whether the victim is armed.
In addition, the presence or threat of a gun may influence an interaction
along multiple dimensions. A firearm may increase or decrease the likelihood
that a potentially violent situation will arise. For instance, an offender
with a firearm may be more likely to attempt a robbery, but knowing the
victim has a firearm may lead the offender to forgo the crime. The presence
of a firearm may also affect the likelihood that an interaction ends in
violence or death. For example, it might be that the presence of a gun in a
robbery is associated with higher death rates, but lower injury rates.
The intent of the persons, the nature of their interaction and relationships,
the availability of firearms to them, and the level of law enforcement are critical
in explaining when and why firearm violence occurs. Without attention to this
complexity it becomes very difficult to understand the role that firearms play in
violence. Even if firearms are shown to be a cause of lethal violence, the
development of successful prevention programs remains a complex undertaking,
as such interventions would undoubtedly have to address the many factors
other than the firearm that are involved in any violent situation.
Many people derive benefits from firearm ownership. Some people
hunt or shoot at target ranges without ever inflicting harm on any human.
It is estimated that there are 13 million hunters in the United States (U.S.
Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, 2002) and more than
11,000 shooting tournaments sanctioned by the National Rifle Association
each year (National Rifle Association, 2002). Others have firearms because
they believe the weapons will help them defend themselves. Many people
carry their weapons on their person or in their cars. We do not know
accurately how often armed self-defense occurs or even how to precisely
define self-defense. The available data are believed to be unreliable, but
even the smallest of the estimates indicates that there may be hundreds of
defensive uses every day (Cook, 1991; Kleck and Gertz, 1995).