1 Executive Summary
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115
There is hardly a more contentious issue in American politics than the
ownership of guns and various proposals for gun control. Each year tens
of thousands of people are injured and killed by firearms; each year
firearms are used to defend against and deter an unknown number of acts
of violence; and each year firearms are widely used for recreational purposes.
For public authorities to make reasonable policies on these matters,
they must take into account conflicting constitutional claims and divided
public opinion as well as facts about the relationship between guns and
violence. And in doing so they must try to strike what they regard as a
reasonable balance between the costs and the benefits of private gun ownership.
Adequate data and research are essential to judge both the effects of
firearms on violence and the effects of different violence control policies.
Those judgments are key to many important policy questions, among them:
Should regulations restrict who may possess and carry a firearm? Should
regulations differ for different types of firearms? Should purchases be delayed
and, if so, for how long and under what circumstances? Should
restrictions be placed on the number or types of firearms that can be purchased?
Should safety locks be required? While there is a large body of
empirical research on firearms and violence, there is little consensus on even
the basic facts about these important policy issues.
Given the importance of these issues and the continued controversy surrounding
the debate on firearms, the Committee to Improve Research Information
and Data on Firearms was charged with providing an assessment of
the strengths and limitations of the existing research and data on gun violence
and identifying important gaps in knowledge; describing new methods to put
research findings and data together to support the design and implementation
of improved prevention, intervention, and control strategies for reducing
gun-related crime, suicide, and accidental fatalities; and utilizing existing
data and research on firearms and firearm violence to develop models of
illegal firearms markets. The charge also called for examining the complex
ways in which firearm violence may become embedded in community life and
considering whether firearm-related homicide and suicide have become accepted
as ways of resolving problems, especially among youth. However,
there is a lack of empirical research to address these two issues.